Re:Portland’s Small-House Movement Is Catching On
by CalRobert on Sunday October 02, 2016 @06:02PM
(#12624502)
Not to mention the horizontal space they demand everyone else dedicate to parking, so "their" on-street space is always available.
Re:Portland’s Small-House Movement Is Catching On
by superuser2 on Sunday October 02, 2016 @06:09PM
(#12624534)
This is so bizarre. I knew I wanted to keep my car, so I filtered my search to apartments with parking available and factored it into the rental price in my comparisons. My building's garage has pretty high occupancy - the demand is there. It's unclear why the developer would need to be legally coerced to add parking, when the market demand is there. And if the market demand isn't there, what's the point of an empty parking garage?
Re:Portland’s Small-House Movement Is Catching On
by CalRobert on Monday October 03, 2016 @04:12AM
(#12625988)
Primarily because people who were in the area before the developer made the apartment came to consider the on-street parking "theirs" and didn't want to share it with newcomers. It's a very inefficient allocation of space, not to mention a burden on the taxpayer to make everyone else purchase private automobile storage because you wish to have exclusive use of public automobile storage.
We do have a crisis of entitlement: people feel entitled to hold the vertical space in their neighborhoods empty when it is worth much more than they're willing to pay.
The unreasonable luxuries being demanded here are unobstructed views and a cozy small-town feeling for the price of one house purchased decades ago, when they are worth the price of several dozen skyscrapers.