Re:Apple's response to the WoSign incidents
by jedberg on Saturday October 01, 2016 @01:53PM
(#12619021)
And yet, unless you go through the effort of removing every trusted CA from your browser, you implicitly trust them because Mozilla/Google/etc. do.
And thus why the CA system is broken in a nutshell.
Re:Apple's response to the WoSign incidents
by mixedCase on Saturday October 01, 2016 @10:45PM
(#12620835)
>And thus why the CA system is broken in a nutshell.
I wouldn't call it broken. From what I see on Linux and Windows, Chrom[e|ium] relies on the system's trusted certificates. You always have the last says on who's in and who's out.
EDIT: Just checked, the Chromium-specific trusted CAs can be revoked through its configuration interface, doesn't just rely on system certs. Important detail, but still, user has the last word.
Re:Apple's response to the WoSign incidents
by arkydon on Saturday October 01, 2016 @04:38PM
(#12619769)
Also accused of gaming antivirus tests http://www.pcworld.com/article/2919554/tencent-qihoo-antimal...
Remember, this is a "security" company.
It's rather fascinating: https://webdesign.tutsplus.com/articles/qihoo-360-secure-the...
Personally, I wouldn't trust anything this "security" company is connected with anywhere need my devices, software, or business.