News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change by protomyth on Saturday October 01, 2016 @01:06PM (#12618755)
> Painting the situation as "corporate contributer-wannabes" and "IANAL but let's do it anyway" is loaded language that seems intended to bring up negative tropes.

Theo de Raadt said neither phrase.

Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change by karlshea on Saturday October 01, 2016 @01:30PM (#12618893)
I think everybody here knows what ">" means.
Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change by notaplumber on Saturday October 01, 2016 @01:33PM (#12618907)
Except for refulgentis, apparently.
Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change by karlshea on Saturday October 01, 2016 @01:37PM (#12618931)
I don't see where refulgentis claims Theo did. Clearly, those are quotes from the person Theo is replying to.

Theo seems to agree with that person though, and "wishing ill on a series of people clearly trying to do well" certainly could apply to both parties in the email.

Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change by refulgentis on Saturday October 01, 2016 @05:18PM (#12619925)
I apologize, I didn't intend to give the impression my post was limited to addressing Theo. I expressly avoided addressing an individual, but clearly that wasn't enough.