Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change
by karlshea on Saturday October 01, 2016 @01:30PM
(#12618893)
I think everybody here knows what ">" means.
Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change
by notaplumber on Saturday October 01, 2016 @01:33PM
(#12618907)
Except for refulgentis, apparently.
Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change
by karlshea on Saturday October 01, 2016 @01:37PM
(#12618931)
I don't see where refulgentis claims Theo did. Clearly, those are quotes from the person Theo is replying to.
Theo seems to agree with that person though, and "wishing ill on a series of people clearly trying to do well" certainly could apply to both parties in the email.
Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change
by refulgentis on Saturday October 01, 2016 @05:18PM
(#12619925)
I apologize, I didn't intend to give the impression my post was limited to addressing Theo. I expressly avoided addressing an individual, but clearly that wasn't enough.
Theo de Raadt said neither phrase.