Re:What 2,000 Calories Looks Like (2014)
by dropit_sphere on Thursday September 29, 2016 @12:31PM
(#12606586)
On the "Actually dropit, it's quite achievable if you plan for longer than ten minutes into the future" correction---yeah, you're right. It's just cathartic to complain, ha. Thanks for your reply.
Re:What 2,000 Calories Looks Like (2014)
by croon on Thursday September 29, 2016 @12:45PM
(#12606733)
Heh, I get it. Anyone should go with what works for them. I sure as hell have tried handfulls of different macros/diets/regiments to see what fits me physically, socially, mentally, timewise. Good luck!
Re:What 2,000 Calories Looks Like (2014)
by another_account on Thursday September 29, 2016 @12:50PM
(#12606786)
3250 even though im currently injured. This might not end well ;-)
I still follow the 1g per pound even though im aware its too much based on research. Its a habit now. I was just answering in the the context of why high protein in general. Not high protein zero carb. I should have made that clear.
That's 667g of chicken a day, or less if you combine it with yoghurt, eggs, beans, protein powder, etc. That's ~1050kcal if going just chicken.
That's all the protein you need. If you're gaining, I'm assuming you're aiming for 2500kcal and up. 3000? 4000?
Eating any more protein than that is a waste at best, and kidney stones at worst. Just eat whatever you want on top of getting your protein quota. Carbs aren't great, but some won't hurt you. And you should really go for more fat, and that's very calorie dense.
And just to reiterate: I'm counting very high on protein, it's unlikely you'll use more than 150g a day, if that. And that will significantly decrease the amount of kcal you'll get in the pursuit of protein. Go nuts with the rest.
[1]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22150425
[2]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19927027
[3]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24472635
[4]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22935440