News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Volume – The world’s first personal volumetric display by goranb on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @02:29PM (#12600054)
Pepper's Ghost display?
Re:Volume – The world’s first personal volumetric display by achr2 on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:23PM (#12600503)
I think it's a very similar effect, except the 'reflection' surface is also the projection surface, across 10 panes. They've also obviously used some interesting optics for projection surfaces. Might be light guides.
Re:Volume – The world’s first personal volumetric display by sp332 on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @02:51PM (#12600230)
It looks like multiple such displays stacked up, for true depth. Each of your eyes will see a slightly different image because it has real parallax, and each person around a display will see from a different angle too.
Re:Volume – The world’s first personal volumetric display by mistercow on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @02:55PM (#12600261)
"Multiple pepper's ghost displays stacked up" doesn't really make sense. Pepper's ghost requires a lot of space, and it isn't really stackable.
Re:Volume – The world’s first personal volumetric display by sp332 on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @04:22PM (#12601019)
You're right. Each display uses diffuse instead of specular reflections. That way each pixel that gets projected onto the screen shines in all directions.
Re:Volume – The world’s first personal volumetric display by achr2 on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:16PM (#12600445)
It's a very similar effect except the image in projected onto the glass 'reflectors' directly.
Re:Volume – The world’s first personal volumetric display by DanBC on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @02:45PM (#12600185)
This appears to stack a bunch of displays together, so not pepper's ghost.
Re:Volume – The world’s first personal volumetric display by mobiuscog on Thursday September 29, 2016 @06:55AM (#12604370)
Pepper's Ghost(s) ;)
Re:Volume – The world’s first personal volumetric display by mistercow on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @02:52PM (#12600238)
They specifically say that it is not.