News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by meric on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @06:54AM (#12588589)
I have a theory where the bimodal distributions comes from two sets of people: one set focused only passing the course/assignment/test, the other set focused on actually knowing the content. Appearance and substance.
Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by mafribe on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @07:00AM (#12588617)
Interesting theory.

I have a different one, derived from teaching 1000s of students over 2 decades. the bimodal distributions comes from two sets of people: one set working hard and putting the hours in until the master the subject, the other set being lazy, cheating, and don't put the hours in, so they never achieve mastery. Appearance and substance.

Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by kgwgk on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @07:23AM (#12588713)
How is it different?
Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by meric on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @09:38AM (#12589466)
"The ten-thousand thing-kinds are ultimately alike and ultimately different. This is called the great similarity-difference." - Zhuangzi
Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by Bartweiss on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @09:52AM (#12589568)
In meric's model, the student who get good grades aren't the same ones achieving mastery. In mafribe's, they are.
Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by meric on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @09:56AM (#12589589)
I must insist although "achieving mastery" is clearer than "knowing the content", I meant the same. It would probably help if I wrap "knowing" in asterisks like "knowing the content".
Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by bonoboTP on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @07:27AM (#12588730)
That's my experience too. There are those who want to get a degree with the least amount of work and don't really find the topic interesting. And then there are those who will discuss it and debate it before/after class, etc.

Good test to tell them apart: if the lecturer mistakenly starts to talk about stuff that he already said in the last lecture (i.e. mistakenly doing the last one again), the first group will be happy and silent because there will be less stuff to learn for the test. The second group will tell the lecturer because they want to learn. This is then often mistaken by the first kind of people as trying to please the professor or "siding" with the prof instead of the fellow students. Because they think in a school-mindset.

Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by walshemj on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @09:14AM (#12589337)
I suspect that some do cs because they are interested and some because its a hot field or because of family/social pressures
Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by collyw on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @12:59PM (#12591059)
I did a batchelors in Molecular Biology years ago, and I noticed that some of my friends seemed to just learn the material, whereas I tended to understand the material.
Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by splatcollision on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @07:01AM (#12588622)
FYI, you have an untested hypothesis, not a theory. Unless you have done some research somewhere. Sorry for the pedantics!
Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by hueving on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @08:25AM (#12589054)
Poster was using the dictionary definition[1], the the scientific one.

1. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory