News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by praneshp on Monday September 26, 2016 @09:49PM (#12586996)
No, I did not. I thought it was privately owned (like Stanford, Johns Hopkins, USC, etc).
Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by kelukelugames on Monday September 26, 2016 @10:33PM (#12587122)
LMAO. I'm sorry but that's hilarious. How many years were you there?
Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by paulddraper on Monday September 26, 2016 @11:45PM (#12587310)
I didn't go there, but I thought the same. "Techs" seem to always be private...MIT, Cal Tech, Florida Tech, etc.

(Oh, by the way, Florida Tech definitely fits the aforementioned stereotype.)

Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by erastuscravath on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @09:27AM (#12589404)
Understandable misconception, but he went there.

Not being able to recognize cluelessness in other people might just be an understatement.

Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by praneshp on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @12:39AM (#12595443)
Except for reading up on the school's history (which I wasn't too keen to), is there another indication that a school is public?
Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by paulddraper on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @11:02AM (#12590084)
Yeah, I suppose so.
Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by Fomite on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @01:24AM (#12587606)
Virginia Tech is also public.
Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by praneshp on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @12:04AM (#12587368)
2, got a MS there, after a Bachelors in India. You must be thinking I fit the profile :-)