Re:UnGoogled Chromium: Chromium with enhanced privacy, contr...
by foob on Sunday September 25, 2016 @09:08PM
(#12578476)
Firefox's extension system was powerful but there was next to no chance that XUL based UI was ever going to be adopted in the other major browsers. I'm sure that tapping in to the Chrome extension ecosystem was a big factor in the decision but I would argue that the Chrome extension API was also a far better suited candidate for cross browser standardization.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:UnGoogled Chromium: Chromium with enhanced privacy, contr...
by duskwuff on Monday September 26, 2016 @12:53AM
(#12579322)
Firefox's extension system was arguably too powerful. Back when I ran Firefox, I regularly ran into extensions that conflicted because they monkeypatched the same parts of the browser UI.
Re:UnGoogled Chromium: Chromium with enhanced privacy, contr...
by cpeterso on Monday September 26, 2016 @01:05AM
(#12579357)
Microsoft Edge is also adopting a Chrome-compatible WebExtension API:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/03/21/microsoft_edge_exten...