B) The premise of operating a successful military is more important than operating a, uih, civilian military.
In which logic putting an unstable person who committed suicide recently in solitary, is acceptable?
My question maybe hurt's so bad, since your have thrown everything you got at me, otherthan giving simple answer.
Your military justice system is fucking worse than terrorist.
I apologize -- I suspected and but didn't fully realize I was dealing with someone who was unhinged.
I have thrown basically nothing at you, and your ridiculous defensiveness here is suspect.
And to call the Military Justice worse than terrorist [sic] exposes you as non-English.
Your rabid bias against America is evident, your overwillingness to use rather petty and ignorant hyperbole is evident, and when someone dares not agree with you, you become unhinged and defensive and quite nasty.
Have a good day, Hater, but know that your immature nonsense does nothing but embarrass yourself.
P.S. will you watch a video of ISIS beheading people as they scream and blood squirts? Will you watch ISIS dropping 24 children into a vat of acid where they scream for HOURS? Your knowledge of military justice and terrorism makes me wonder your allegiance. One would have to support ISIS to find the acid-torture of children to be better than solitary confinement.
You finished your answer with comparing your military system with ISIS beheading. That was what I looking at. Your comparison standard for your military system is ISIS, Wow. You literally proved my point.
Have good day. BTW It is not secret. I am Iranian. But I don't believe in nationality. I am kinda extreme anarchist.
No, it's not, I was mocking you by engaging in the same ignorant and low-effort hyperbole that sadly makes up the bulk of your contribution here. I suppose your limited English skills prevent you from understand ridicule and mockery, so I'll spell it out for you.
Don't you see how you just "fell for it"? How I used outrageous hyperbole to literally make fun of you, and you took it seriously?
So, you're new to jingoistic nationalism is what you're telling me.
Cool, welcome to the 19th century. You have about 200 years of history to catch up on! I'm guessing you've just learned about Napoleon's army based on your opinion, so hoy-boy do you have a wide variety of nationalist nations and their armies to study!
But while we do hold our service personnel in high esteem and treat them with respect, we also hold them accountable and try very hard to stamp out incidences of human rights abuse, gender inequality, bullying etc. within our defence force.
We tend not to let patriotic fervour limit that accountability.
Australian servicemen and servicewomen are still subject to military law and courts martial, same as the USA. And sexual abuse and harassment is still a serious issue [0].
[0] http://www.news.com.au/news/australian-navy-faces-male-sex-c...
But in her case (and in most others here), outside agencies will step up to the plate and ask serious questions and take charge of the situation if defence force personnel are seen to be unbecoming of their conduct.
Do the most senior generals in the US military draw the line in the sand like David Morrison did a couple of years back? [1]
Except on Nauru?
http://kvpr.org/post/save-children-ex-employee-leaks-details...
And while it may be cognitively useful to pretend Australian border defense is not a military issue, you have created a ranked force defending the state's "territorial integrity" through the use of force.
You originally wrote, "I find it at odds that a nation that has such ardour and pride for their servicemen and servicewomen would basically condone human rights abuse by and unto those same personnel."
The UN has repeatedly decried Austrlia's migration policies as human rights abuses.
The reason migration policies are germane, even if they're enforced by civilians, is because they're an example where Australians exhibit the same blind spots you're decrying in people from other countries.
If you're genuinely curious how people take pride in flawed governments, look closer to home. Really though, it's a universal human condition.
In one tiny post you demonstrate sad ignorance to the subject (anyone with even a -passing- knowledge of civilian vs military justice is laughing at you) as well as the sad bias which empowers your triumphant ignorance, so bravo.
Out of curiosity, which nations Military Justice System do you prefer?