News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ha4: Concurrent ML and HOPAC by transfire on Saturday September 24, 2016 @03:33PM (#12572246)
Wooh. That [HOPAC API](http://hopac.github.io/Hopac/Hopac.html) is ginormous! How can anyone seriously code with that?
Re:Ha4: Concurrent ML and HOPAC by xyz-x on Sunday September 25, 2016 @05:02AM (#12574509)
I code using it. It's awesome. Here's a sample of my code https://github.com/haf/Http.fs/blob/releases/v4.x/HttpFs/Htt...
Re:Ha4: Concurrent ML and HOPAC by mamcx on Saturday September 24, 2016 @06:06PM (#12572850)
Consider that it provide multiple ways around concurrency.
Re:Ha4: Concurrent ML and HOPAC by platz on Saturday September 24, 2016 @05:13PM (#12572676)
compared to what, your favorite standard library ? note there are different modules..
Re:Ha4: Concurrent ML and HOPAC by eyelidlessness on Sunday September 25, 2016 @03:11AM (#12574318)
What's with the awful font and seriously slacker half attempt at alignment? I basically can't read anything on that page.
Re:Ha4: Concurrent ML and HOPAC by polytypic on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @11:31AM (#12590331)
Thanks! I removed the bold attribute from links so things should align better now on some browsers.
Re:Ha4: Concurrent ML and HOPAC by eyelidlessness on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @09:35PM (#12594790)
1. That helps a lot!

2. The alignment still leaves a lot to be desired. There's stuff that is clearly intended to align that doesn't, and it's more distracting than if it didn't attempt to align at all.

3. I apologize for the insulting way my previous comment was written. I try not to do that; I must have been grumpy, but it's no excuse.

Re:Ha4: Concurrent ML and HOPAC by polytypic on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @11:24PM (#12603098)
No problem.

There were still some bolded elements, so I switched to a different color scheme and further removed bold elements.

Looking through the doc I can't spot any cases where alignment would be unintentionally wrong. I think the next thing to do to improve readability would be to add some spacing around groups of definitions. This way different alignments used in side-by-side groups should cause less visual interference. I suspect that the visual interference from side-by-side groups is what makes the alignment look distracting.