News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bogdanov affair by dorfsmay on Saturday September 24, 2016 @09:30AM (#12570849)
Is there some Godwin's law corollary 34 that any online crititique on a venue with devs will end turning into a critique of javascript?
Re:Bogdanov affair by sangnoir on Saturday September 24, 2016 @04:17PM (#12572459)
I've mostly seen this on HN - but I don't visit a lot of forums. Looks like PHP is out and Javascript is in; lots of people have an axe to grind with Javascript (e.g. gp - the segue is almost comical). I can imagine an article on a new dental procedure, with the first comment "Root canal is painful, just like javascript ha ha amirite"

I would be interested in finding out the proportion of HN threads that end up having 'javascript' mentioned when the original discussion was not remotely related.

Re:Bogdanov affair by ethbro on Saturday September 24, 2016 @12:18PM (#12571480)
... did you just compare the modern JavaScript framework landscape to Nazis? ;)
Re:Bogdanov affair by trhway on Saturday September 24, 2016 @03:29PM (#12572222)
actually it is you who did it.
Re:Bogdanov affair by throwanem on Saturday September 24, 2016 @11:12AM (#12571232)
There really should be!
Re:Bogdanov affair by dorfsmay on Saturday September 24, 2016 @12:18PM (#12571476)
Let's make it a thing:

https://twitter.com/dorfsmay/status/779682343611011072

PS: Today I learned that Godwin introduced Godwin's law in 1990 as an experiment in memetics!