Re:Sad reality: It's cheaper to get hacked than build strong...
by jhanschoo on Friday September 23, 2016 @09:54AM
(#12564599)
Actually, it was the free space. Everyone who used Gmail didn't trust it very much and was wary about Google sharing their info, especially as it was showing ads related to your email archive.
Re:Sad reality: It's cheaper to get hacked than build strong...
by richmarr on Friday September 23, 2016 @08:11AM
(#12563949)
Not sure I agree that it was Google and Yahoo's respective security architecture that caused people to switch, even tech-savvy people.
Re:Sad reality: It's cheaper to get hacked than build strong...
by peterbonney on Friday September 23, 2016 @08:47AM
(#12564123)
Sure. But all the things Gmail offered were things that probably looked like lousy investments to Yahoo. Why offer more storage? Why have better spam filtering? Why have better security? It all costs money!!!
The point is only looking at actual cost, not opportunity cost.
Re:Sad reality: It's cheaper to get hacked than build strong...
by richmarr on Friday September 23, 2016 @12:54PM
(#12566040)
Yep. Good clarification.
Re:Sad reality: It's cheaper to get hacked than build strong...
by karmelapple on Friday September 23, 2016 @08:14AM
(#12563965)
Fully agreed. It was all about a lot of free storage space.
But lost revenue opportunities don't show up in the bottom line, so cost-focused managers don't think about them. And they conclude it's "cheaper" to not invest in this or that thing that their smarter competitors are doing.
"What gets measure gets managed." People think this (apocryphal) Drucker quote is advice. It is not advice. It's a warning.