News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Akamai takes Brian Krebs’ site off its servers after ‘rec... by Thaxll on Thursday September 22, 2016 @11:50PM (#12562181)
Akamai is probably way bigger than Cloudflare, so if they don't take customer that got a 620Gb DDoS I doubt Cloudflare will.
Re:Akamai takes Brian Krebs’ site off its servers after ‘rec... by johncolanduoni on Friday September 23, 2016 @12:01AM (#12562218)
I think the bigger issue was that he wasn't a customer (they provided the service pro bono), not that Akamai wouldn't keep a customer that got hit with such an attack.
Re:Akamai takes Brian Krebs’ site off its servers after ‘rec... by michaelt on Friday September 23, 2016 @07:24AM (#12563743)
Traditionally, journalists and celebrities getting freebies get /better/ service than regular paying customers.

I don't see why being pro bono would matter in an established company?

Re:Akamai takes Brian Krebs’ site off its servers after ‘rec... by buro9 on Friday September 23, 2016 @07:58AM (#12563888)
If you're under attack, try us out. We'll aim to surprise you in the most unsurprising and dull way possible, by keeping your site online throughout.
Re:Akamai takes Brian Krebs’ site off its servers after ‘rec... by thomasahle on Friday September 23, 2016 @05:29AM (#12563346)
Cloudflare has this on their website: "600Gbps: Largest DDoS attack stopped" - https://www.cloudflare.com/under-attack-hotline/ But I suppose attacks may differ in other ways that Gbps.
Re:Akamai takes Brian Krebs’ site off its servers after ‘rec... by VoidWhisperer on Friday September 23, 2016 @06:26AM (#12563513)
If I remember what cloudflare's article said, that 600gbps attack was a reflection/amplification attack, which for them is likely easier to filter out then just large amounts of direct DDoS traffic, which is what this was evidently.