Re:Akamai takes Brian Krebs’ site off its servers after ‘rec...
by Thaxll on Thursday September 22, 2016 @11:50PM
(#12562181)
Akamai is probably way bigger than Cloudflare, so if they don't take customer that got a 620Gb DDoS I doubt Cloudflare will.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Akamai takes Brian Krebs’ site off its servers after ‘rec...
by johncolanduoni on Friday September 23, 2016 @12:01AM
(#12562218)
I think the bigger issue was that he wasn't a customer (they provided the service pro bono), not that Akamai wouldn't keep a customer that got hit with such an attack.
Re:Akamai takes Brian Krebs’ site off its servers after ‘rec...
by michaelt on Friday September 23, 2016 @07:24AM
(#12563743)
Traditionally, journalists and celebrities getting freebies get /better/ service than regular paying customers.
I don't see why being pro bono would matter in an established company?
Re:Akamai takes Brian Krebs’ site off its servers after ‘rec...
by buro9 on Friday September 23, 2016 @07:58AM
(#12563888)
If you're under attack, try us out. We'll aim to surprise you in the most unsurprising and dull way possible, by keeping your site online throughout.
Re:Akamai takes Brian Krebs’ site off its servers after ‘rec...
by thomasahle on Friday September 23, 2016 @05:29AM
(#12563346)
Cloudflare has this on their website: "600Gbps: Largest DDoS attack stopped" - https://www.cloudflare.com/under-attack-hotline/
But I suppose attacks may differ in other ways that Gbps.
Re:Akamai takes Brian Krebs’ site off its servers after ‘rec...
by VoidWhisperer on Friday September 23, 2016 @06:26AM
(#12563513)
If I remember what cloudflare's article said, that 600gbps attack was a reflection/amplification attack, which for them is likely easier to filter out then just large amounts of direct DDoS traffic, which is what this was evidently.