Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea...
by hiddenkrypt on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @10:25AM
(#12548411)
It doesn't. They need a constant stream of new data for their business model to work. Thus, they benefit from continuously collecting data on users.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea...
by tanqueray on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @10:55AM
(#12548691)
So why do they store indefinitely? If they stated a retention period openly they'd get much less criticism over privacy.
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea...
by yellow_postit on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @11:35AM
(#12549146)
I'd assume for machine learning developments, specifically as training data and back testing. Build a new model with 3x the data you had before or be able to retrospectively see how a model would have performed over 3 years rather than 1.
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea...
by miend on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @01:05PM
(#12550079)
Don't forget that they're also entirely complicit to NSA demands for live access to data as well, per the somewhat-recent leaks. That's another level of evil above regular profit motivations.