News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Julia v0.5.0 Released by tempodox on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @07:19AM (#12538613)
I take it, there is still no support for the production of stand-alone binary executables?

Rumours persist that this feature is planned. Or are they just plain wrong?

Re:Julia v0.5.0 Released by ihnorton on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @09:48AM (#12539434)
Re:Julia v0.5.0 Released by whyrt12 on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @03:43PM (#12542661)
How close are we to web assembly compilation?
Re:Julia v0.5.0 Released by ihnorton on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @10:30PM (#12544994)
I'm not aware of anyone working on it. There were some attempts with Emscripten which ran in to unsupported instructions; some of those may be supported by newer versions of Emscripten, but I haven't heard of any attempts to get this going recently.
Re:Julia v0.5.0 Released by whyrt12 on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @01:22AM (#12545617)
Gotcha. Is it definitely technically feasible, or is that still unknown?
Re:Julia v0.5.0 Released by ihnorton on Thursday September 22, 2016 @10:19AM (#12556940)
For Julia core it should be feasible, but possibly requiring patches to Emscripten, so the level of effort is still unknown. The other issue is the C and Fortran numerical libraries -- some of which use inline-assembly, others (Fortran) don't have a working LLVM frontend as far as I know.
Re:Julia v0.5.0 Released by Jcol1 on Thursday September 22, 2016 @02:26PM (#12558965)
Got it