Re:Embraer Phenom 300 yaw damper fail due to loss of GPS sig...
by JshWright on Saturday September 17, 2016 @05:03AM
(#12519772)
The HN title is literally the subject of the notice, very slightly paraphrased (abbreviations expanded, etc), so you may want to let the FAA know they got it wrong...
I also think you misread the notice. The report is stating the loss of GPS apparently resulted in the subsequent loss of a number of other systems, including the yaw damper.
Re:Embraer Phenom 300 yaw damper fail due to loss of GPS sig...
by throwaway_exer on Saturday September 17, 2016 @05:38AM
(#12519841)
I think you're right. The wording about "no yaw damper" would have been clearer as "failed yaw damper" - I guess that's what was meant.
Re:Embraer Phenom 300 yaw damper fail due to loss of GPS sig...
by Filligree on Saturday September 17, 2016 @10:22AM
(#12520584)
How much oscillation? On a scale from "bumpy ride" to "holy shit my wing's off".
Re:Embraer Phenom 300 yaw damper fail due to loss of GPS sig...
by JorgeGT on Saturday September 17, 2016 @10:43AM
(#12520678)
Dutch roll is characterized by a low frequency oscillation, with a period in the order of seconds. So it wouldn't be a "bumpy" ride but a slooow yet continuous, very nauseating oscillation (try to slowly rock forward and backward in your chair).
What this is saying:
1) If you don't have a yaw damper, then you'll have a rough ride
2) because the autopilot will induce oscillation (dutch roll) after loss of GPS