News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pardon Snowden by yodsanklai on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @02:02PM (#12499612)
I tend to agree with Chomsky's views, but sometimes I feel he's too extreme and that makes him lose credibility. Maybe it's my misunderstanding, but he often sounds like there is a bunch of people, "the elite" that plan together how they are going to control the rest of the world. I see this instead as a natural, non-coordinated phenomenon caused by various powerful people trying to serve their self-interests.
Re:Pardon Snowden by wry_discontent on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @04:07PM (#12500784)
If you read more of what he says, you'll find Chomsky says exactly this.
Re:Pardon Snowden by emmelaich on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @06:26PM (#12501728)
So you might summarise Chomsky's book as "some people are more persuasive than others"

Does he also say that these people may be powerful because they are persuasive?

Re:Pardon Snowden by elliotec on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @09:31PM (#12502690)
I think it's more along the lines of they are persuasive because they are powerful. The golden rule: he who has the gold makes the rules.
Re:Pardon Snowden by emmelaich on Thursday September 15, 2016 @01:45AM (#12503732)
Well of course they're persuasive because they are more powerful. That's the main theme (as I understand it) and agree.

I was suggesting the other way is true too.

Re:Pardon Snowden by Retra on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @07:42PM (#12502193)
It is easy to be persuasive when you are asking people to simply remain as they are: uninformed on important matters.