News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google’s become an obsessive stalker by anotherarray on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @09:15AM (#12496509)
Google can be a huge troublemaker in countries with weak privacy laws.

If I google my friends name, I can see their college grades, most legal occurrences (from company incorporation to lawsuits and alimony) and probably the equivalent to their SSN.

Re:Google’s become an obsessive stalker by tanqueray on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @09:51AM (#12496834)
The US has remarkably weak privacy laws, does it not? As in there aren't really any laws on data retention, pseudonymization etc. let me know if I've got the wrong impression.
Re:Google’s become an obsessive stalker by themartorana on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @09:36AM (#12496683)
Has Google made this information public? Or are they just indexing it?
Re:Google’s become an obsessive stalker by kuschku on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @09:41AM (#12496716)
They have turned it from "can only be found by a dedicated person" to "anyone can find it".

Societies usually ban that difference.

Re:Google’s become an obsessive stalker by mercutio2 on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @11:04AM (#12497637)
"Societies usually"?

I know a few European cultures, most notably the Germans, make a big deal about this difference, but I'm not aware of other cultures where distinguishing between public-but-obscure and public-and-indexed is a thing.

In my opinion it's a terrible distinction to make, as it gives users false comfort about what's actually unavailable to the public.

Re:Google’s become an obsessive stalker by kuschku on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @12:10PM (#12498380)
Even the US seperates stalking from taking a picture of random people in the background of a landscape picture.

The difference between "public and indexed" and "public but obscure" is huge.

It’s also the same difference as "taking a photo of outside" vs. "permanent video surveillance of everywhere".