News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Death of the Cyberflâneur by busterarm on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @08:35PM (#12493430)
I'm not sure I agree. I think the whole idea of a flâneur or "surfing" the web is that you choose where you go. There's an illusion of control.

The whole click-bait industry depends on you browsing within walled gardens (facebook, reddit) and being on the conveyor belt of places your attention has to go.

A flâneur or surfer can just go somewhere else. There's only so much physical real estate you can own. There isn't exactly another facebook or reddit to go to...and if there is, BuzzFeed is all over that shit too.

Basically, the internet has driven the minimum cost of advertising/branding down to bit-transmission prices. Anybody basically can afford to throw shit everywhere and see what sticks.

It's messy out there...

Re:The Death of the Cyberflâneur by pavel_lishin on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @09:48PM (#12493726)
What about things like reddit, especially - as mentioned before, things like Weird Facebook?

Sure, it's curated, but so were the arcades of the original flaneurs. And you can always follow links.

(I do think that webrings were really well suited for this, though, and that's something reddit, etc. can't quite replicate.)

Re:The Death of the Cyberflâneur by jack_rabbit on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @01:02AM (#12494341)
Yeah, I understand your argument. I think it's not a bad one.