News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Experiments with disabling the ME on Sandybridge x230 by ktRolster on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @02:59PM (#12491221)
It's been hacked before, too, see:

https://defcon.org/images/defcon-22/dc-22-presentations/Kall...

and

http://legbacore.com/Research_files/HowManyMillionBIOSWouldY...

The example in the first link is especially depressing, because they found an integer overflow vulnerability in a code file that started with this warning comment:

   /*
   Caution: This module requires additional review when
   modified.
   This driver will have external input − capsule image.
   This external input must be validated carefully 
   to avoid security issue like buffer overflow, integer
   overflow. */
And of course, later someone came along and added an integer overflow.
Re:Experiments with disabling the ME on Sandybridge x230 by yuhong on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @03:07PM (#12491280)
That is not Intel ME.
Re:Experiments with disabling the ME on Sandybridge x230 by ktRolster on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @03:37PM (#12491511)
Yeah, it's just a sub-ring-0 rootkit.
Re:Experiments with disabling the ME on Sandybridge x230 by sspiff on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @04:58AM (#12495085)
Intel ME is a step beyond UEFI, so this kind of bug, while bad in UEFI, would be much worse if found in Intel ME.