News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Weirdly broken Wi-Fi access points by userbinator on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @06:29AM (#12486822)
I think the problem is not with the actual IP routing part, as that is relatively straightforward, but with all the other value-added "features" that get crammed into the same and often underpowered hardware. At the least, a consumer WiFi router will contain an IP router, a NAT, and an AP, and it's the NAT that probably contributes a lot to the connectivity failures people are seeing that go away when the "router" is rebooted --- NAT tables filling up due to many half-open or lingering connections that didn't get closed properly. The aggressive nature of many applications' connection usage (e.g. "why does my router stop responding when I use torrents?") doesn't help either.
Re:Weirdly broken Wi-Fi access points by toast0 on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @09:59AM (#12488262)
It's not just terrible NAT, although that's popular. I already do NAT on a PC server, so I run wifi routers in access point mode, and still need to do periodic reboots because the wireless interface stops working.
Re:Weirdly broken Wi-Fi access points by Senji on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @06:41AM (#12486873)
I've seen wifi AP+NAT+Router units that choke on 100 concurrent connections. Some of these are absolute trash.