News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why Ruby is an acceptable Lisp (2005). Parent comment

Re:Why Ruby is an acceptable Lisp (2005) by qwertyuiop924 on Saturday September 10, 2016 @06:33PM (#12471167)
I don't know how you got a lispm, but nice for you :-).

I was confusing you with Rainer (who, by coincedence, goes by the username lispm on HN), who actually loves CL environments.

As for me, I set my store by Geiser. Integrated documentation from all the implmentations it supports, repl (as well as the capability to connect to a remote one), support for all three big Schemes, is an emacs extension, and has excellent docs? Consider me sold.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Ruby is an acceptable Lisp (2005) by pjmlp on Saturday September 10, 2016 @07:17PM (#12471329)
I wish.

I meant in what concerns papers, videos and magazines articles back from those days.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Ruby is an acceptable Lisp (2005) by qwertyuiop924 on Saturday September 10, 2016 @07:24PM (#12471351)
...Ah. Yeah, I wish I had a lispm too, but I don't even have the more pedestrian antiques.
[ Parent | on HN ]