News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:VotePlz – The Easiest Way to Vote by enraged_camel on Thursday September 08, 2016 @07:21PM (#12458343)
I'm a progressive and I totally disagree with your line of reasoning.

The next POTUS will nominate a Supreme Court judge. That is far, far more important than any local issue because Supreme Court decisions have MAJOR impact for the entire country and they supersede any lower-court decisions and invalidate all conflicting laws.

When the Supreme Court says that separating black and white students in public schools is unconstitutional (Brown vs. Board of Education, 1954), it affects you directly.

When the Supreme Court says women have a constitutional right to abortion (Roe v. Wade, 1973), it affects you directly if you're a woman and/or have had your partner need/want to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.

When the Supreme Court says corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts of money in elections (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 2010), it affects you directly.

Sure, local politicians may affect more day-to-day life matters, but in the grand scheme of things, those don't matter too much. I mean, if you think the amount of budget allocated to the local school system is too little, move to another city/state with a better-funded school system. Not super easy to do, but moving to another country however is considerably more difficult.

Re:VotePlz – The Easiest Way to Vote by sidlls on Thursday September 08, 2016 @08:42PM (#12458841)
This is among the least important reasons to vote on the POTUS. Most SCOTUS cases are actually far more narrow in scope and impact than the ones you described. Aside from that, in this particular election there is no good reason to favor either major party candidate with respect to SCOTUS, if one's agenda is a progressive one. So the motivation to GOTV for them based on SCOTUS is isn't necessarily there.
Re:VotePlz – The Easiest Way to Vote by sksnxjis on Friday September 09, 2016 @02:14AM (#12459969)
Trump provided a list of conservative legal figures he might nominate - whether or not Clinton's choices would be ideal, progressives should find them better than Trump's.

To give a concrete example, the current deadlock has stopped Obama's deferred action immigration program, affecting the status of millions of immigrants. It seems likely a Clinton appointee would flip that result, while a Trump appointee would not.

Re:VotePlz – The Easiest Way to Vote by sidlls on Friday September 09, 2016 @08:48AM (#12461633)
On the other hand Hillary seems to be keen on augmenting the government's spying activities, criminal enforcement, and foreign aggression. There is no good reason to think that Clinton's nominees will in aggregate be better.
Re:VotePlz – The Easiest Way to Vote by specialist on Thursday September 08, 2016 @11:42PM (#12459515)
The next POTUS will nominate a Supreme Court judge.

You know Clinton's got this one in the bag, right? It's a done deal. The parties are now just fighting out how bad/good the ass whooping will be.

But to your point... There are local judicial races every year which directly impact your well-being. The players on the the right KNOW that every vote matters, that every race matters, that every inch must be contested, because the system is a giant pyramid.

Re:VotePlz – The Easiest Way to Vote by alexbecker on Friday September 09, 2016 @01:44AM (#12459872)
Why do you think Clinton's got this in the bag? She's leading by 3-4 percentage points in both national and most swing-state polls[1], which is less than the movement we've seen in the past month. And 15-20% of voters are undecided or third-party right now, significantly increasing the volatility of the polls. FiveThiryEight's analysis[2], which I think is quite thorough, gives Clinton a ~70% chance of winning. Far from "in the bag".

[1] Specifically, weighted (by sample size) averages of such polls. [2] http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

Re:VotePlz – The Easiest Way to Vote by specialist on Friday September 09, 2016 @03:01PM (#12465130)
Elections are now won by GOTV efforts. Boots on the ground, volunteers, doorbelling, phone banking, etc.

Whereas Clinton has the 2nd most sophisticated operation in history, Trump doesn't have anything that remotely resembles a campaign, much less an effective GOTV effort.