News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“Dear Mark. I am writing this to inform you that I shall ... by robryan on Thursday September 08, 2016 @06:03PM (#12457758)
Basically only when the law says that something is illegal.
Re:“Dear Mark. I am writing this to inform you that I shall ... by kefka on Thursday September 08, 2016 @06:17PM (#12457898)
And that answer is what is wrong with capitalism.

Why can a drug maker jack their prices up 100x? Because it's profitable.

Why do gas companies raise their prices when there's an impending disaster (hurricane, blizzards, etc.)? Because they can.

Capitalism is great in a different aspect: it provides a form of unaccountable eugenics. Your parents were poor, and went to a public school that wasn't funded well. That travels along with life, leading to a harder life for you. Less money for the essentials, and perhaps health insurance.

There's nobody out there with a knife going to kill you; it's more of ling-chi or death by a thousand cuts. And the culmination amounts to moralizations like "You should have went to better school", or "Its your fault not getting a better job", or insults of "Lazy".

But your lifespan is shortened; there's less everything for you. And society has no one to blame except you. Well, other than every other actor who causes tiny bits of pain and suffering... but not enough to quantify. Not like they could sue, anyways.

Re:“Dear Mark. I am writing this to inform you that I shall ... by jshevek on Thursday September 08, 2016 @06:49PM (#12458119)
I agree with you the first three stanzas of your post, but is this what is wrong with "capitalism", or is this what is wrong with "the way we are currently doing capitalism" ?
Re:“Dear Mark. I am writing this to inform you that I shall ... by kefka on Friday September 09, 2016 @12:20PM (#12463622)
Capitalism, the economic theory as posited by Adam Smith in "The Wealth of Nations" fails when stuff approaches infinity.

We already have a taste of it with the internet, where it's 'Create once, share everywhere'. The idea of scarcity is forced via legal tools, where scarcity means little.

And now, with cheap solar, leads to cheap/free energy. And robots are creating more and more goods. And we're on the cusp of a level 4 vehicle automation systems. As this trend continues, many things will approach 'infinity' the same way they do already online.

What does that mean? It means that people could have the requirements of life provided as a citizenship right: food, water, shelter, electricity, internet, plus a bit more. Unlike the older socialism and communism systems, that required people be slaves to the state and work in prescribed manners, robots and computers could be the provider of these essential resources.

And that starts looking at post-capitalism systems. Would there be money? Of course. Some resources would still be rare. But this idea of "go to work so you can eat and survive" would no longer be hanging over people's heads like a guillotine.

Re:“Dear Mark. I am writing this to inform you that I shall ... by ranko on Thursday September 08, 2016 @06:11PM (#12457841)
Taking a very narrow legal view, you're correct. Surely, however, we can make more sophisticated judgements than "legally it's OK, therefore morally it's OK".
Re:“Dear Mark. I am writing this to inform you that I shall ... by tormeh on Thursday September 08, 2016 @06:26PM (#12457951)
Does morality matter?

It sounds dumb, but in this context I'm actually not sure.

Re:“Dear Mark. I am writing this to inform you that I shall ... by ridgeguy on Thursday September 08, 2016 @09:10PM (#12458968)
It's not dumb. When corporate executives make decisions, they're explicitly constrained by legality. Morality is negotiable. And relative.
Re:“Dear Mark. I am writing this to inform you that I shall ... by posterboy on Friday September 09, 2016 @04:33AM (#12460463)
Law is ideally not different to morality. The same ethic measures should apply to both. The law is supposed to codify morality. It can capture only so many aspects of daily life, so there is a personal responsibility for everyone to account for the cases not explicitly mentioned. Law is also negotiable, that's why parliament literally means discussion.
Re:“Dear Mark. I am writing this to inform you that I shall ... by posterboy on Friday September 09, 2016 @12:00PM (#12463427)
Add to that, it's proper protocol to wait for consent before affecting other people.
Re:“Dear Mark. I am writing this to inform you that I shall ... by jawbone3 on Thursday September 08, 2016 @06:10PM (#12457830)
Ah yes, and its not like what the law labels illegal ever changes, especially not when people are upset about something legal...