News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google and Box Announce Partnership by davidu on Thursday September 08, 2016 @12:49AM (#12450377)
At a company of any size, with compliance and complex sharing requirements, and advanced search and workflow needs, Drive is a non-starter.
Re:Google and Box Announce Partnership by parent5446 on Thursday September 08, 2016 @01:16AM (#12450454)
Posting evidence of this would be useful, because Drive is pretty comprehensive in terms of compliance. Also not sure what you mean by "workflow needs". Why would you use a file storage service to manage workflows in the first place?
Re:Google and Box Announce Partnership by enraged_camel on Thursday September 08, 2016 @01:46AM (#12450563)
Because most workflows involve some kind of document. Automatically routing that document to different people and standardizing the way they interact with it can be very beneficial.
Re:Google and Box Announce Partnership by parent5446 on Thursday September 08, 2016 @11:26AM (#12453899)
Wouldn't that what the Drive API can be used for? I may be answering my own question here, but I imagine that would be the most useful part of this Box/Drive partnership. :D
Re:Google and Box Announce Partnership by flukus on Thursday September 08, 2016 @03:43AM (#12451035)
> Why would you use a file storage service to manage workflows in the first place?

Person A can only read document X because they are performing duty b on project y.

Not everything works with binary can/can't read scenarios.

Re:Google and Box Announce Partnership by parent5446 on Thursday September 08, 2016 @11:25AM (#12453884)
> Person A can only read document X because they are performing duty b on project y.

How is this _not_ a binary can/can't read scenario? The person can either read it because they're performing the duty, or can't ready it because they're not.

Re:Google and Box Announce Partnership by flukus on Thursday September 08, 2016 @07:21PM (#12458341)
It's not binary because they should only be able to read it while performing duty b. There needs to be something that enables/disables access when they start/stop working on it, or checks access before the read it.
Re:Google and Box Announce Partnership by em500 on Thursday September 08, 2016 @03:29AM (#12450963)
I'm working at a 10000+ employee, 1B+ revenue corp and G-Drive is the standard filesystem on the corp computers.
Re:Google and Box Announce Partnership by snnn on Thursday September 08, 2016 @07:17AM (#12451946)
I was. if you have a plenty of files, how could you search something in a specific folder? e.g. I want to search 'hadoop' in my personal work notes, not in public ebooks and slides.
Re:Google and Box Announce Partnership by davidu on Thursday September 08, 2016 @11:19AM (#12453814)
That's frightening.

I would suggest your security team do an audit with CloudLock (note, we acquired them at Cisco) and my guess is that it'll be illuminating / shocking.

Re:Google and Box Announce Partnership by hemancuso on Thursday September 08, 2016 @07:17AM (#12451941)
How do you manage the syncing of presumably a huge amount of data amongst many groups?
Re:Google and Box Announce Partnership by MrFlynn on Thursday September 08, 2016 @01:15AM (#12450450)
The company I work at has gotten around these restrictions with AODocs. It adds a lot of enterprise features Drive is missing (workflow setup, version control, etc.). It works well for us, but it's still by no means a perfect solution.