Re:Pirates Plunder 4K Hateful Eight, but Did They Crack DCP?
by jonah on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @03:12AM
(#12441403)
Yes, of course, but it's a lossy copy since you're de-compressing and then re-compressing the content. (At 4k is that as important? I dunno, I'm not a movie fanatic.)
Re:Pirates Plunder 4K Hateful Eight, but Did They Crack DCP?
by ddt_Osprey on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @03:39AM
(#12441486)
I would not say a brute force copy must be necessarily lossy by default.
In theory, if the picture is revealed on a display, upon which the full pixel raster can be distinguished for every frame (in real time or slower), an optical capture may be performed, which preserves the original fidelity of the image, and one need not recompress as lossy for peers who have the capacity to receive the full duplicate.
All images are eventually revealed optically somehow. Such images may be captured directly, and corrected and restored according to original quality, if you have good video equipment.
Only one good copy needs to make it into the open, and then the cat's out of the bag.
Who would EVER care about a cipher key, when YOU STILL NEED TO EXPOSE THE RAW PIXEL RASTER, AND AUDIO CHANNELS TO THE END USER, IN ORDER FOR ANYTHING TO BE VALUABLE AT ALL?
Users will always eventually get the whole thing in the clear, in straight-up plain text somehow, eventually anyway. And all anyone needs is a buffer big enough to capture it, and it's trivial to assemble one.
You need to be able to watch a movie with the naked eye, and hear the sound with your ears. That's how movies work.
It's trivial to capture the raw data, and people have been living with NTSC quality picture and sound for decades.
This is not about perfectly matching the SHA256 hashes of the original MPEG artifacts. People just want a copy, and it's easy to skim one, somehow, one way (cracking) or another (brute force direct copies of the image frames and pulse code samples, at the signal source).