Re:The Drug of Choice for the Age of Kale
by throwanem on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @12:35AM
(#12440993)
'Negative'? That seems a touch harsh, although possibly just because I find myself on the pointy end.
Re:The Drug of Choice for the Age of Kale
by salmon30salmon on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @12:40PM
(#12444818)
Maybe less "negative" and more "non-constructive". It is a personal annoyance of mine when a reply points out a flaw or misunderstanding, but does so behind a veil of ambiguity. It completely passes up on a chance to educate the OP, and instead leaves them feeling uncertain.
You mean "reason" in the sense of "why" and he means reason in the sense of "logical conditions". The why is an interesting question, what environmental or other factors provided an advantage in a plant containing this chemical, or was it a non-important side effect of some other change. It is interesting, maybe not easily knowable.
Hope this clears it up. I may be wrong, but I get annoyed when I read comments that are negative without an explanation, so I thought I would attempt to shine some light.