News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Snow Crash Revisited: Grokking a Satire of Mimesis by throwanem on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @09:37PM (#12440470)
Certainly not! And I hope I haven't given insult. If so, it was entirely unintentional on my part, and I apologize for my carelessness in so doing. I'll put more thought into my words next time.

Don't get me wrong - I don't mean to say that all of Stephenson can be encompassed in those two words. Were that the case, he wouldn't have had to spend time writing books. I mean only that, if you're looking for a handy way to convey a primacy of idea over character in what an author chooses to explore, "high concept" is an adjectival phrase commonly understood to carry that meaning. Might save you some time, is all. (And, on the Internet of 2016, a dictionary is never far away...)

Re:Snow Crash Revisited: Grokking a Satire of Mimesis by qwertyuiop924 on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @06:30AM (#12442126)
No insult given. Your suggestion of high concept is entirely reasonable.
Re:Snow Crash Revisited: Grokking a Satire of Mimesis by 1propionyl on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @01:09AM (#12441075)
Ah but you see my adjectives are better...
Re:Snow Crash Revisited: Grokking a Satire of Mimesis by throwanem on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @07:37AM (#12442441)
More convenient, perhaps. It's like programming in a way - why reinvent a wheel you don't have to?
Re:Snow Crash Revisited: Grokking a Satire of Mimesis by gbhn on Thursday September 08, 2016 @01:16AM (#12450453)
Thanks, that's a useful phrase!