News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Multi-process Firefox brings 400-700% improvement in resp... by AstralStorm on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @01:37PM (#12437723)
Except mobile hardware which does not. Power usage is always a concern.
Re:Multi-process Firefox brings 400-700% improvement in resp... by wongarsu on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @02:22PM (#12438085)
>Except mobile hardware which does not.

Source?

RAM available in mobile phones seems to grow exponentially [1]. Power efficency of processors also seems to grow exponentially [2] (does anybody have a source for ARM processors?).

[1]: https://i.imgur.com/AWkmMJc.png (note logarithmic scale) [2]: https://www.karlrupp.net/2013/06/cpu-gpu-and-mic-hardware-ch...

Re:Multi-process Firefox brings 400-700% improvement in resp... by RussianCow on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @02:58PM (#12438374)
Power usage has little to do with memory usage. In fact, if the browser is using more RAM as a cache, it won't hit persistent storage as much, which actually increases battery life.
Re:Multi-process Firefox brings 400-700% improvement in resp... by danudey on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @05:40PM (#12439474)
If that exaggerated RAM use causes other more intensive apps and their data to be evicted, that can cause a much more significant load when the app has to spin up again and re-acquire or re-calculate its state.
Re:Multi-process Firefox brings 400-700% improvement in resp... by AstralStorm on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @03:45AM (#12441500)
The extra chips are not free. What we are seeing is bringing up the latest low power tech into the phones for now. Except RAM has hit maximum densities per chip already or is very close.

Remember that RAM has to be powered on for every refresh cycle...

It is "nothing" compared to screen or radios, but it is there. So you won't be seeing more than one Dram chip in there, footprint notwithstanding.

Re:Multi-process Firefox brings 400-700% improvement in resp... by xorblurb on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @03:31PM (#12438657)
Browser are caching web content, not much persistent storage content... and the OS does persistent storage caching fine, typically no need to try to add your own (poor) layer to do that.