News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Revenge porn: More than 200 prosecuted under new law by wodenokoto on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @06:09AM (#12434789)
I think the thought is, that basically no pictures you take of anybody come with any formal consent of showing them around.
Re:Revenge porn: More than 200 prosecuted under new law by Jabbles on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @07:00AM (#12435039)
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2016/22/enacted

The law relates to "a photograph or film which shows, or appears to show, another person (“B”) in an intimate situation,"

which is further defined:

"a person is in an “intimate situation” if—

(a)the person is engaging or participating in, or present during, an act which—

(i)a reasonable person would consider to be a sexual act, and

(ii)is not of a kind ordinarily done in public, or

(b)the person’s genitals, buttocks or breasts are exposed or covered only with underwear."

Re:Revenge porn: More than 200 prosecuted under new law by InclinedPlane on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @04:55PM (#12439232)
Thought? No, the law. As Jabbles points out.

How about this. Would you be comfortable with someone who had an intimate/sexual photo of you sharing it around?

Don't be shitty to other people. Why is this hard?

Re:Revenge porn: More than 200 prosecuted under new law by nl on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @06:12AM (#12434808)
This maybe true, but some may well come with a expectation of privacy.