So many of these CSS frameworks claiming to be "dead-simple" and "responsive".

From the first page of https://www.google.com/search?q=minimal+css+framework, we have Milligram, Pure, Base, MinimalCSS, Bulm, and Skeleton. There's even a GitHub project which catalogs this: https://github.com/neiesc/ListOfMinimalistFrameworks#framewo...

So my question would be: what sets Wing apart and why should I use it compared to all other grid-ready, responsive, minimal frameworks out there?

I am curious as well. The page looks very similar to skeleton's homepage.

What does this offer that other frameworks don't?

Mousing over "check it out" makes the center div jump up and blur momentarily. The same effect is more pronounced when mousing away from it as the button fades back to its default.

Apparently my skills for debugging live CSS could use improvement since I can't find whatever's changing to cause the effect.

Oh I see, this is a known issue, as webkit will treat the text in the same div of the button, which has a transform, as an image. This makes things blurry as a price of hardware acceleration.

See more here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4641522/how-to-force-re-r...

I will try getting this fixed.

That's weird...

Can you give more details? What do you mean by the center div?

Thanks for the feedback :)

I'm experiencing the same thing. by the center div, I think he means the big text in the center where "WING" is. When you hover over it, it sort of twitches a little bit.

On my Nexus 5X mobile the page scrolls also horizontally, revealing a white space.

I think that's not a problem with the framework, but the CDN link in a box that should instead be scrolling unto itself. Still worth a GitHub issue to get fixed...

Hmm, this might be because the code block is too big.

I will try it out :)

Awesome! Be sure to send me a link :)