[dead]
Re:Giant Panda no longer an endangered species
by userbinator on Monday September 05, 2016 @12:01PM
(#12430928)
Very long... 2K in total may not be endangered, but it's still a tiny population.
Re:Giant Panda no longer an endangered species
by maxerickson on Monday September 05, 2016 @12:48PM
(#12431177)
A better understanding of how to get them to breed in captivity has been a big part of growing the population. I guess bootstrapping a population to be used for meat would be wildly unpopular, but it could probably be done in a way that didn't have much impact on the wild population or captive population that is used for conservation.
Which I'm not arguing it is a good idea, just pointing out that growing the population partly involved figuring out better panda husbandry, which is the same knowledge you need to produce meat.
Re:Giant Panda no longer an endangered species
by Grue3 on Monday September 05, 2016 @01:11PM
(#12431275)
Yeah, a good example would be bison. They almost went extinct, and there are only a few thousands of wild bison, and yet bison meat is commercially produced.
Re:Giant Panda no longer an endangered species
by acjohnson55 on Monday September 05, 2016 @06:30PM
(#12432580)
The vast majority of these are bison-cow hybrids, interestingly: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_bison#genetics
Re:Giant Panda no longer an endangered species
by HaloZero on Monday September 05, 2016 @01:53PM
(#12431442)
I think pandas don't have a fast enough birth cycle for that.
Re:Giant Panda no longer an endangered species
by maxerickson on Monday September 05, 2016 @02:05PM
(#12431505)
Oh I agree that it wouldn't be a very interesting enterprise as far as making money, I just think you could do it without having much negative impact on the conservation efforts.