News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In defence of Douglas Crockford by erpellan on Sunday September 04, 2016 @05:24AM (#12423511)
I certainly wouldn't feel 'comfortable' speaking at a conference with a reputation for publicly character-assassinating their invited speakers. Especially as the worst accusation I could find on twitter was that he used the word 'stupid'. Several times! Throw away the key...
Re:In defence of Douglas Crockford by stuaxo on Sunday September 04, 2016 @11:56AM (#12424971)
It would be insane to go into such a humourless environment where every conversation feels like treading on eggshells.
Re:In defence of Douglas Crockford by mistermann on Sunday September 04, 2016 @12:39PM (#12425268)
It might also be a good idea to not hire someone with this sort of political leanings into your organization, if you know what I mean.

It seems to me like numerous advocacy organizations nowadays have run out of genuine grievances and are now attacking largely innocent things, possibly in turn harming their cause.

Re:In defence of Douglas Crockford by ineptech on Sunday September 04, 2016 @06:18PM (#12426996)
If you love reading "I found a meteorite!" blogs, pretty soon you're going to find an odd rock in your back yard and think it's a meteorite.

If you love reading "I found a UFO!" blogs, pretty soon you're going to see something weird in the sky and think it's a UFO.

If you love reading "I found a misogynist!" blogs...

Re:In defence of Douglas Crockford by protomyth on Sunday September 04, 2016 @01:50PM (#12425698)
I might also be a bit worried as a speaker that people looking over the speaker list might think I was one of those that lead to the disinvite and thus be a poor person to invite if for no other reason than further hassle.