Re:Nano to remain in GNU
by qwertyuiop924 on Saturday September 03, 2016 @11:22PM
(#12422507)
It's lightweight: my point is there are reasons for using nano beyond "d'oh, I don't know what I'm doing." You don't bring up emacs to edit fstab, or your hosts file. As a result, it's popular among newbies. But that doesn't mean it's without merit, as is all too often implied.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
With emacsclient you can easily open those files, quickly, in Emacs; in fact, I would argue you should. fstab has its own editing mode in Emacs with syntax highlighting and so does hosts.
Re:Nano to remain in GNU
by qwertyuiop924 on Sunday September 04, 2016 @07:37AM
(#12423826)
...do you really need syntax highlighting for fstab?