News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In defence of Douglas Crockford by GirlsCanCode on Saturday September 03, 2016 @11:16PM (#12422488)
I'm a woman with an EE degree. I hate non-tech "women" who go to conferences that have no real interest in (like Pycon, Ms. Richards) just to push some wacky agenda.

These "women" aren't making it easier for real girls in real engineering programs.

Re:In defence of Douglas Crockford by ageofwant on Sunday September 04, 2016 @12:36AM (#12422732)
I am a man with an EE degree. Most all placed I worked in my 20 years of professional life I've had female bosses, typically also EE degreed. Yes there were typically less women sure, but as a rule they were better respected as engineers and managers. Especially when they were both. They also drove better cars so I'm going to assume they were adequately compensated too.
Re:In defence of Douglas Crockford by jacalata on Sunday September 04, 2016 @03:30AM (#12423244)
Why are you using "quotes" around women? It also sounds like you are unfamiliar with the job of developer evangelist (which Richards held) - it is actually a pretty common position in the programming industry, perhaps not so much around electrical engineering. Here's an explanation - https://sendgrid.com/blog/explained-developer-evangelism-par...
Re:In defence of Douglas Crockford by hgcarter on Sunday September 04, 2016 @04:56AM (#12423439)
I suspect she put the quotes because "real women" code and don't talk, just like "real men".

Developer evangelist is a nonsense job that can be useful to a company to attract certain funding, nothing more. It's the politically correct version of a booth babe.

Re:In defence of Douglas Crockford by labrador on Sunday September 04, 2016 @06:13AM (#12423639)
I suspect the quotes around "woman" are about trans men who start speaking for all women after they transition. I imagine some women are bothered by this. I have no evidence of this, just trying to explain the quotes.