Re:Ask HN: Where do you go for civil discussion on the Inter...
by danneu on Friday September 02, 2016 @04:49PM
(#12416164)
A big pain point of the subreddit system would be solved in an amusing way if subreddits were qualified by the creator's name.
Example: /r/@theymos/bitcoin. Now, instead of looking like Reddit's canonical Bitcoin discussion forum, you're reminded that it's just one person's forum at the mercy of one person's agenda.
Re:Ask HN: Where do you go for civil discussion on the Inter...
by ScottBurson on Friday September 02, 2016 @02:06PM
(#12414926)
Exacerbated.
Re:Ask HN: Where do you go for civil discussion on the Inter...
by simonswords82 on Friday September 02, 2016 @02:07PM
(#12414935)
It was a test to see if anybody read to the end. And thanks :)
If you fail to understand what the preset rules of engagement and opinions are you're going to have a bad time. Worse still, if you happen to disagree with the general consensus of a sub your opinion will simply be downvoted and your voice will not be heard. You're very unlikely to be educated by existing sub members as to why your opinion is wrong with any real sense of perspective because the hive mind has kicked in and you're not aligned with it.
The larger the sub, the more this problem is exacerbated as there are more people ready and waiting to hit the downvote button. This means that you're very unlikely to encounter a balanced and sensible (aka civil) discussion on Reddit.