Re:The Moby Dick theory of big companies (2007)
by vonnik on Thursday September 01, 2016 @08:36PM
(#12409917)
Great article. For anyone who wants a book-length drama revolving around the same pitfalls, read Jerry Kaplan's great account of GO Computing, published in the mid 90s. Time is on their side, and so is the Koolaid.
Re:The Moby Dick theory of big companies (2007)
by jonnathanson on Thursday September 01, 2016 @05:20PM
(#12408980)
The analogy strains at times, but I don't find it completely ridiculous. In the world of sales and BD, "whale" is a common name for a very big account or target. Oftentimes this means a big company.
Re:The Moby Dick theory of big companies (2007)
by Analemma_ on Thursday September 01, 2016 @05:41PM
(#12409124)
I think what the parent meant was that "Moby Dick" as a metaphor for "something alien and unknowable whose behavior you can't predict or understand" is not how it's usually used, which can be confusing. Usually when Moby Dick is used allegorically, it means "something very rare", or it's a metaphor about being consumed by the pointless desire for vengeance. Neither of those are the way the author used it here.
(More abstractly, if X is usually used in literature as a metaphor for Y, but you use it as a metaphor for Z, and Z and Y are unrelated, readers will sometimes find it hard to follow.)
A closer metaphor might've been Solaris, or some kind of Lovecraftian monster, but that reference may have eluded readers. Oh well.
Re:The Moby Dick theory of big companies (2007)
by jonnathanson on Thursday September 01, 2016 @06:31PM
(#12409358)
Gotcha.
I've usually heard Moby Dick referenced to mean something elusive or borderline impossible to catch -- which is not necessarily the same thing as rarity, but has a similar outcome I suppose.
Of course, as you point out, the ultimate point of most Moby Dick metaphors is caution: chasing the white whale leads to your doom.
That latter point, even though it isn't the thrust of Andreesen's metaphor, nevertheless comes through in the article. So the whole "Moby Dick = unpredictable" thing doesn't quite hit its mark, but "Chasing Moby Dick = fruitless and possibly self-destructive" still does.
I'd love to see someone reference Solaris in a post like this, but yeah, it's just too obscure for most audiences.
https://www.amazon.com/Startup-Silicon-Adventure-Jerry-Kapla...
> I am thinking of one high-profile Internet startup in San Francisco right now
which specific startup is being referred to in this section of the article?
No idea.
(More abstractly, if X is usually used in literature as a metaphor for Y, but you use it as a metaphor for Z, and Z and Y are unrelated, readers will sometimes find it hard to follow.)
A closer metaphor might've been Solaris, or some kind of Lovecraftian monster, but that reference may have eluded readers. Oh well.
I've usually heard Moby Dick referenced to mean something elusive or borderline impossible to catch -- which is not necessarily the same thing as rarity, but has a similar outcome I suppose.
Of course, as you point out, the ultimate point of most Moby Dick metaphors is caution: chasing the white whale leads to your doom.
That latter point, even though it isn't the thrust of Andreesen's metaphor, nevertheless comes through in the article. So the whole "Moby Dick = unpredictable" thing doesn't quite hit its mark, but "Chasing Moby Dick = fruitless and possibly self-destructive" still does.
I'd love to see someone reference Solaris in a post like this, but yeah, it's just too obscure for most audiences.