Re:A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral
by anigbrowl on Thursday September 01, 2016 @01:39PM
(#12407294)
It's irrational to argue that you would pull out of a merger because a 3rd party's rocket failure delayed a launch. Contracts almost invariably include escape clauses to avoid liability for matters that are outside the control of the parties. If the launch was already scheduled at the time of the merger agreement (which seems likely, a rocket launch is not the sort of thing you arrange at the last minute) then Beijing Xinwei would be expected to factor the risks into its pricing calculations.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral
by mejari on Thursday September 01, 2016 @03:14PM
(#12408063)
The failure of the launch changes the real world situation. It's not irrational to argue that such a change also changes the pros/cons of a merger. The fact that it was related to a 3rd party is irrelevant.
Re:A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral
by jomamaxx on Thursday September 01, 2016 @03:13PM
(#12408058)
"It's irrational to argue that you would pull out of a merger because a 3rd party's rocket failure delayed a launch."
Maybe, maybe not. A lot of things intertwined - moreover, M&A is not the most rational area of business.
Also - one side may 'cancel', huff and puff about it, then use it as a premise to come back to the table and negotiate a much better deal.