Re:A Tax Expert Takes Tim Cook's EU Letter Apart Point by Point
by krona on Thursday September 01, 2016 @09:08AM
(#12404918)
>> a break of contract..
This isn't to do with a contract or treaty as much as how it's interpreted and how that interpretation has changed recently. What's changed in the past 18 months is how the EU Commission interprets the arms' length principle as it relates to international tax law, now using it's own guidelines instead of the international norm/consensus, i.e.: OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. 'Retroactive' is definitely the right word to use.
>> Doesn't matter who gets the money
Perhaps, but it matters who loses it. The US Treasury see it as their money, since the untaxed cash hoard being referred to is on the Apple Inc. balance sheet. The implications for the EU could be far reaching.
This isn't to do with a contract or treaty as much as how it's interpreted and how that interpretation has changed recently. What's changed in the past 18 months is how the EU Commission interprets the arms' length principle as it relates to international tax law, now using it's own guidelines instead of the international norm/consensus, i.e.: OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. 'Retroactive' is definitely the right word to use.
>> Doesn't matter who gets the money
Perhaps, but it matters who loses it. The US Treasury see it as their money, since the untaxed cash hoard being referred to is on the Apple Inc. balance sheet. The implications for the EU could be far reaching.