Re:SEC awards $22M to Monsanto whistleblower
by randyrand on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @06:38PM
(#12394526)
I have nothing against Monsanto and think they are a great company, but I'm glad to hear this. Whistleblower programs are important.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SEC awards $22M to Monsanto whistleblower
by Rondom on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @07:43PM
(#12394851)
Can you elaborate what makes you think that Monsanto is a "great company"? I am genuinely interested.
Re:SEC awards $22M to Monsanto whistleblower
by CobrastanJorji on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @08:19PM
(#12395010)
For one, their executives are known to report accounting improprieties that they encounter to the SEC :)
Re:SEC awards $22M to Monsanto whistleblower
by tanderson92 on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @08:33PM
(#12395063)
That executive is somewhat less likely to report future accounting improprieties ;)
Re:SEC awards $22M to Monsanto whistleblower
by hiddenkrypt on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @10:34AM
(#12398584)
True, but imagine if you were one of the remaining executives. You just saw that guy rat you all out and run off with 22M$. I think that they're going to have to be on their toes, because now the rest of them know exactly what will happen if there's any malfeasance.
Re:SEC awards $22M to Monsanto whistleblower
by randyrand on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @08:23PM
(#12395032)
I'm a big proponent of GMOs and Monsanto has been making very good progress there. The controversy over them suing innocent farmers is exaggerated, IMO. Overall I think they are an undoubtedly hugely beneficial company to society.
Re:SEC awards $22M to Monsanto whistleblower
by themartorana on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @11:24PM
(#12395797)
Is your opinion of exaggeration one that comes from being a farmer? Because I know a few farmers, and the fear is real.
Re:SEC awards $22M to Monsanto whistleblower
by ptaipale on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @09:52AM
(#12398269)
Fear is real but unfounded. You don't get sued by Monsanto for doing something accidentally. You really have to intentionally violate their rights.
The one case referred regarding this (Monsanto vs. Schmeiser) is widely misreported by anti-GMO and anti-Monsanto activists. See Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto_Canada_Inc_v_Schmeise...
The case is widely cited or referenced by the anti-GM community in the context of a fear of a company claiming ownership of a farmer’s crop based on the inadvertent presence of GM pollen grain or seed.[21][22] "The court record shows, however, that it was not just a few seeds from a passing truck, but that Mr Schmeiser was growing a crop of 95–98% pure Roundup Ready plants, a commercial level of purity far higher than one would expect from inadvertent or accidental presence."
Re:SEC awards $22M to Monsanto whistleblower
by Mchl on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @02:34AM
(#12396389)
Does the fear result from Monsanto actually suing them or from anti-GMO propaganda?
Re:SEC awards $22M to Monsanto whistleblower
by rublev on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @08:12PM
(#12394983)
>I have nothing against Monsanto and think they are a great company.
From the perspective of a human being, investor, or...?
Re:SEC awards $22M to Monsanto whistleblower
by DannyB2 on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @12:07PM
(#12399315)
Maybe Monsanto is a great company because an $80 Million fine for accounting issues, and a $22 M whistleblower payment makes for great cover to distract everyone from the things Monsanto does that everyone should actually be paying attention to.
Re:SEC awards $22M to Monsanto whistleblower
by lloyd-christmas on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @02:46PM
(#12400499)
Such as...