If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email [email protected] and give us reason to believe you'll follow the rules in the future.
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12393868 and marked it off-topic.
I do agree that world-changing is a term used in contexts such as disease eradication. Certainly disease eradication changes the world more than avoiding a stay in a hotel. However, world-changing as a term is not restricted to the most impactful change to which it has been previously attached. For a typical programmer, making something that lets millions of people have an easier workday, vacation or home life should count as changing the world, even if it is a bit mundane.
I know most of us 'know' this at one level - well, many do, anyway - but given the infrastructure we build on, most of what we end up building is somewhat 'mundane' by comparison.
Lastly, I'm of an 'older' generation. Those younger than me do not remember a time when what's 'mundane' now was ever exciting/new/revolutionary. Much like having grown up with color TV, telephones and refrigeration and not being able to imagine a world without those, my younger family really can not imagine a world without near-free 24/7 access to info/communication.
"Changing the world" is an ambiguous concept, but you can't say it hasn't had an impact on cities across the world.
I'm in Europe and I just polled a whole bunch of friends, anyone using these companies and got a resounding NOPE.
I just polled a bunch of US friends too and they say the same. Sure, purely anecdotal.
But for me, none of these have changed the world.
Maybe if you worship at the alter of YC or a wannabe Paul/Jessica groupie or liberal/progressive fantasist then I guess you totally buy into that.
Transformed is really a total stretch.
I'm still laughing after listening to that interview.
Waiting for the down-votes and I'm sure this will be flagged as it will upset some thin-skinned people who live in a (tech) bubble.