News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Docker not ready for primetime by lugg on Sunday August 28, 2016 @06:19PM (#12378813)
I'm trying to get started with rkt right now but it's (understandable) lack of maturity is a bit daunting, I think some usability issues need to be handled / offloaded to some other tools. And acbuild severly needs caching built in.

Disclaimer, new to containers, if it sounds like I'm doing something wrong let me know, it certainly feels like I'm missing something right now.

Re:Docker not ready for primetime by jzelinskie on Sunday August 28, 2016 @06:49PM (#12378913)
You'll see a maturity in this space after the Open Containers Initiative standardizes the container image format. Then, developers can focus on UX improvements rather than worrying about what the build tool should even be producing.
Re:Docker not ready for primetime by jmspring on Sunday August 28, 2016 @07:38PM (#12379083)
Reliance on initiatives and standards bodies to provide a guidance for maturity, at least in recent years, is a fools errand. They usually end up rubber stamping what's been the norm and work back from there.
Re:Docker not ready for primetime by cesnja on Monday August 29, 2016 @01:25AM (#12380177)
That's true, OCF is more or less the same as the Docker container format.
Re:Docker not ready for primetime by pescerosso on Monday August 29, 2016 @01:09PM (#12383321)
If you are looking at rkt, if you have time, take a look at Kurma (open-source too). Kurma was built using the same specification rkt was built from. Here is the getting started guide: http://kurma.io/documentation/kurmad-quick-start/ What I like of kurma is that I can simply run docker images from the hub, no need to download, convert, etc.

Disclaimer: I am an Apcera employee and Kurma is an open-source project sponsored by Apcera