Why bad scientific code beats code following “best practices” (2014)

Re:Why bad scientific code beats code following “best practi... by mamon on Sunday August 28, 2016 @01:59PM (#12377558)

Are you refering to this? :)

http://www.connexin.net/computer-software-humor-jokes/progra...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why bad scientific code beats code following “best practi... by collyw on Sunday August 28, 2016 @02:02PM (#12377574)

Almost. I have tried to find it a few times but never been able to since I first stumbled upon it. The funniest part was the end result (the most experienced programmer) being exactly the same as the first - which this version is missing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why bad scientific code beats code following “best practi... by SmurfJuggler on Sunday August 28, 2016 @02:36PM (#12377781)

https://medium.com/@webseanhickey/the-evolution-of-a-softwar...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why bad scientific code beats code following “best practi... by collyw on Monday August 29, 2016 @02:43AM (#12380402)

Yes, thats the one!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why bad scientific code beats code following “best practi... by prance on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @02:06PM (#12392408)

Actually it's not exactly the same: he added a README.

[ Parent | on HN ]