Breaking a myth: Data shows you don’t actually need a co-founder

Re:Breaking a myth: Data shows you don’t actually need a co-... by Amygaz on Saturday August 27, 2016 @03:36PM (#12373810)

I agree with you. And I also have a tendency, based on a few personal experiences, to associate self-proclaimed visionaries, with narcissistic personality disorder. And it is also my experience that, besides being very active in taking credits for other people ideas, design and work, they are typically lazy and a hindrance.

However, somehow, they're alway seems to be able to find people who will do the job for them, from bench work to CEO work, so they can call themselves successful.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Breaking a myth: Data shows you don’t actually need a co-... by jomamaxx on Saturday August 27, 2016 @06:58PM (#12374553)

There is definitely such a thing as 'architecture' role in software.

Usually they have a lot of experience, and work on larger teams where such things are necessary.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Breaking a myth: Data shows you don’t actually need a co-... by rdtsc on Saturday August 27, 2016 @09:10PM (#12374861)

Agree. I didn't mean that the role is not there. It is more about people walking around and saying "I am the architect". I've heard that once. He wasn't joking.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Breaking a myth: Data shows you don’t actually need a co-... by jomamaxx on Saturday August 27, 2016 @10:34PM (#12375060)

There's nothing wrong with someone saying 'I'm the architect' - if that's what they really are. That said, it might be a power thing.

Now - there's more wrong in saying 'I'm an architect' - because architect really is not a profession, really. I suppose you could kind of get away with saying that if you have a lot of experience, and have been in the role of architect for some time, but it's a difficult thing to say and strains credibility if you were to put it on a resume.

[ Parent | on HN ]