News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is Microsoft Excel an Adequate Statistics Package? by Mikeb85 on Saturday August 27, 2016 @02:35PM (#12373542)
IMO adding scripting to a spreadsheet is a waste of time when R can simply import a spreadsheet, perform whatever operations needed, then spit out another spreadsheet/database/whatever format you want.
Re:Is Microsoft Excel an Adequate Statistics Package? by actuallyalys on Saturday August 27, 2016 @02:59PM (#12373655)
Plus, if you use a tool like RStudio or Jupyter, it's pretty easy to see the data as you manipulate it, which is a commonly cited advantage of Excel, with none of the awkwardness of trying to look at cell formulas.
Re:Is Microsoft Excel an Adequate Statistics Package? by blahi on Saturday August 27, 2016 @03:48PM (#12373865)
That would depend on what you want to do. If by statistical analysis you mean regression or similar tasks, then sure R is the way to go.

However there are other family of analytics tasks which can be summed up as "decision analysis". Taking regression models (for example, maybe even built in R) and simulating them under different inputs, getting quantiles, sensitivity, etc. This goes much further with multiple sets, multiple outcomes with decision trees (NOT regression trees/CART) and even further with solvers. Excel is the best option in those tasks most of the time because of quick data entry and already built output reports and interfaces.

Re:Is Microsoft Excel an Adequate Statistics Package? by tangue on Sunday August 28, 2016 @01:39AM (#12375440)
For people used to code, yes. But many excel user won't leave the ui they're familiar with. Including R will build a bridge between Excel user and modern development features (testing, vc ...)