Re:Are Index Funds Eating the World?
by mysterypie on Saturday August 27, 2016 @05:02AM
(#12371634)
> asset managers are paid for getting more assets under management, not their fund's profits.
I've always wondered why they aren't paid a percentage of profits? That would align their interests with the customers'.
Re:Are Index Funds Eating the World?
by OscarCunningham on Saturday August 27, 2016 @05:35AM
(#12371695)
They're generally paid both. They often charge "two and twenty" meaning 2% yearly of the assets under management and 20% of the profit. (Of course they don't absorb 20% of the losses in a bad year)
Re:Are Index Funds Eating the World?
by smallnamespace on Saturday August 27, 2016 @08:56AM
(#12372157)
That's only hedge funds, which are a small fraction of total fund capitalization.
Re:Are Index Funds Eating the World?
by OscarCunningham on Saturday August 27, 2016 @07:15PM
(#12374604)
What are the percentages of the market occupied by different fund types? Where would I go to look that up?
Re:Are Index Funds Eating the World?
by smallnamespace on Sunday August 28, 2016 @11:54AM
(#12376989)
http://www.hedgefundfacts.org/hedge/wp-content/uploads/2009/...
Page 4
"Hedge funds as a percent of total: 1.1%"
Re:Are Index Funds Eating the World?
by janpieterz on Saturday August 27, 2016 @01:09PM
(#12373191)
Or even a percentage that increases by the percentage of profit.
So siphoning money away to index funds does put a direct crimp on active managed fund managers' compensation.