News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chinese Chipmaker Unveils 64-Core ARM Processor by xiaopanga on Friday August 26, 2016 @09:59AM (#12366267)
Modern cores are more like 1V or lower. so more like 100A
Re:Chinese Chipmaker Unveils 64-Core ARM Processor by revelation on Friday August 26, 2016 @10:07AM (#12366339)
That's crazy. Do modern cores not also use local, integrated power regulation? I think I remember an Intel PR release about that, but I don't know the detail.
Re:Chinese Chipmaker Unveils 64-Core ARM Processor by pstrateman on Friday August 26, 2016 @10:15AM (#12366388)
> Process:Manufacturing with 28nm process

standard Vcc for 28nm is 850-1050mV (varies based on the exact process)

so yeah more like 100A and probably that's all going through the pins without on die power regulation

Re:Chinese Chipmaker Unveils 64-Core ARM Processor by xiaopanga on Friday August 26, 2016 @10:19AM (#12366431)
The inductors are still too big to be on-chip
Re:Chinese Chipmaker Unveils 64-Core ARM Processor by hatsunearu on Friday August 26, 2016 @10:29PM (#12370615)
Intel toyed around with fully integrated inductors even in production but I think they kicked them off chip for thermal reasons.
Re:Chinese Chipmaker Unveils 64-Core ARM Processor by brandmeyer on Friday August 26, 2016 @04:16PM (#12369015)
IIRC, the only part they replaced was the controller IC itself. All of the main power components (switching transistors, filter inductors and capacitors) remained off-chip.

Consider that the VRM's have as much or more silicon in them than in the host processor, and they have completely different breakdown voltage and switching speed requirements relative to a CPU.

Re:Chinese Chipmaker Unveils 64-Core ARM Processor by mattthebaker on Friday August 26, 2016 @01:20PM (#12367736)
Intel only recently introduced this feature, and it surely required a lot of R&D. At the time they were most likely the only one, and may still be.
Re:Chinese Chipmaker Unveils 64-Core ARM Processor by xorblurb on Friday August 26, 2016 @03:12PM (#12368578)
Then they removed it in their most recent chips...