News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Uber launches flat fares in San Francisco through subscription. Parent comment

Re:Uber launches flat fares in San Francisco through subscri... by John23832 on Thursday August 25, 2016 @10:13AM (#12359117)
> Its seems to be a Socialist trait that it cant happen without being forced on a population by intelligentsia. Is that fair?

No, given the evidence, it's not fair. You could say the exact same thing for Capitalism.

Please. Now you're just being purposefully insulting.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Uber launches flat fares in San Francisco through subscri... by JoeAltmaier on Thursday August 25, 2016 @10:25AM (#12359216)
I'm not confusing Colonialism with capitalism.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Uber launches flat fares in San Francisco through subscri... by John23832 on Thursday August 25, 2016 @10:43AM (#12359366)
What do you think the purpose of Colonialism was?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Uber launches flat fares in San Francisco through subscri... by pjlegato on Thursday August 25, 2016 @07:34PM (#12363302)
"Colonialism" does not exist as such. It's merely a sometimes useful intellectual abstraction, not a real thing. It has no objectives or purpose, because it does not and never actually existed as a real thing. It's merely a summary shorthand for a certain set of ideas.

Trying to impute motives to an unreal analytic abstraction is the reification fallacy.[1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reification_(fallacy)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Uber launches flat fares in San Francisco through subscri... by John23832 on Friday August 26, 2016 @07:43AM (#12365513)
> "Colonialism" does not exist as such.

That is an empty refutation...

Colonialism was(is?) as very real practice. I really don't understand how you can claim that it is an "intellectual abstraction"

You went to Wikipeda for the definition of reification, but not for the definition of Colonialism[1]?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonialism

[ Parent | on HN ]