(What is "our side?" I, similarly, have refused to work for defense industry, TLA agencies, etc, because I see them as net negatives to our society - this is the side I'm on)
He related the story of talking to a friend in national intelligence. The FoaF: "You've got more data on people than we do."
Related:
"China's Internet" (Bloomberg video) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VAesMQ6VtK8
The War on Cash: http://thelongandshort.org/society/war-on-cash
(Also discussed at HN.)
But the strong assumption of the time was that it did.
Who Snowden is/was working for really is likely not of much importance. What matters is what impact he had, which at least to me, is not that clear.
Snowdon showed us there's this agency, with a virtually unlimited budget that can control the politicians that control the world... and they are beholden to no one, the law is a rubber stamp.
Worse, even when it was demonstrated that they outstepped the boundaries of our laws... things have remained unchanged.
Snowdon showed us the truth, then left it up to us to do something about it. Unfortunately, no group of people has so far mustered up any change. That's our own failing.
"US cloud computing firms could lose between $22 billion and $35 billion in overseas business over three years. [Following Snowden leaks.]" http://www.securityweek.com/snowden-revelations-costly-us-te...
The question is: who are they working for?
Snowden was working for the American People, and upholding the US Constitution.
To draw from some relevant if non-US history, Kim Philby's interests did not lie with his nation's subjects, despite his aristocratic pedigree.