News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Massachusetts to tax ride-hailing apps, give the money to... by stale2002 on Sunday August 21, 2016 @02:45AM (#12329729)
No matter how much money you have, you can't buy a better coke.

Income inequality is a misleading metric. I would argue that equality has vastly increased over the years.

The rich don't really live much better lives than the middle class.

Rich or poor we all have roofs over our heads, we all have access to relatively affordable methods of travel to get anywhere in the world in a day, we all use the same IPhones, watch the same movies and drink the same Cokes.

The things that the rich have access to aren't really that much better when you compare it to the old days when you contrast Kings living in Castles to the 90 percent who are just worrying about their next meal.

The world has never been more equal.

Re:Massachusetts to tax ride-hailing apps, give the money to... by tao_oat on Sunday August 21, 2016 @03:46AM (#12329891)
It doesn't sound like you've ever been poor. Quality of life is about far more than the goods you can consume. It's also about job security, your chances of getting promoted, autonomy, fulfillment, and so on. If you know that you're [absolutely screwed][1] if you get fired, or get sick, or miss a paycheck, you don't really get to feel safe.

[1]: www.forbes.com/sites/maggiemcgrath/2015/01/07/majority-of-americans-are-one-surprise-away-from-financial-disaster-survey-says/

Re:Massachusetts to tax ride-hailing apps, give the money to... by robocat on Sunday August 21, 2016 @05:15AM (#12330093)
It doesn't sound like you have ever been to a poor country.

> It's also about job security, your chances of getting promoted, autonomy, fulfillment, and so on

For a large number of people in the world, they are wanting food, basic safety, and healthcare.

Re:Massachusetts to tax ride-hailing apps, give the money to... by angry_octet on Sunday August 21, 2016 @07:00AM (#12330386)
The fact that there are many billions of poor people in the world does not mean that attempting to address inequality in America is pointless tinkering at first world problems.

Being well traveled isn't usually seen as helpful training for ignoring beggars and minimum wage people who need food stamps to eat, but there you go.

Re:Massachusetts to tax ride-hailing apps, give the money to... by stale2002 on Sunday August 21, 2016 @04:54AM (#12330049)
Compared to how extremely screwed you'd be even just 200 years ago? Actually, not even that, 80 years ago.

I think you underestimate how bad things used to be.

Today, if something unexpected happens, you are almost certainly not going to die by like next week.

Re:Massachusetts to tax ride-hailing apps, give the money to... by CydeWeys on Sunday August 21, 2016 @10:19AM (#12331011)
> No matter how much money you have, you can't buy a better coke.

You absolutely can though. There are lots of premium soda brands out there on the market that cost significantly more than Coca-Cola that are made with better ingredients (such as real sugar, not HFCS), that are healthier for you, that use better artificial sugars, that have real flavoring so they don't need as much sugar to taste good (see GuS), etc. Or compare the homogenized product of "Simply Orange" (a Coca-Cola brand) to real non-additive orange juice that costs several times as much but is way more delicious. Or hell, look at how insanely expensive kombucha is ...

My point is that you are introducing a completely artificial rule by limiting things to Coca-Cola, when in fact there is an entire spectrum of drinks out there, and you can spend significantly more money to get a significantly better product. The very rich do not drink nearly as much Coca-Cola as the poor; they have the money to afford better options, and so they do.

Re:Massachusetts to tax ride-hailing apps, give the money to... by stale2002 on Sunday August 21, 2016 @02:17PM (#12332006)
Fair point.

Though I would argue that those options are only marginally better, and may as well be the same.

For example, most people can't tell the difference between a 20 dollar wine and a 200 dollar wine. So the rich and poor effectively have access to the same thing.

Re:Massachusetts to tax ride-hailing apps, give the money to... by CydeWeys on Sunday August 21, 2016 @07:40PM (#12333265)
I think you're veering too far into prescriptive territory here. Yes, most people can't tell the difference between good wine and great wine in double-blind taste tests, but almost nobody ever drinks wine in double-blind conditions. Generally when you're drinking great expensive wine you know that it is expensive, and you enjoy it more as a result. Psychological effects are real effects when we're talking about how much enjoyment people derive from things.

And by the way, the poor absolutely are not drinking $20 bottles of wine. Alcohol consumption is significantly higher in the rich than in the impoverished, because when you struggle with putting food on the table everyday and keeping a roof over your head, any kind of alcohol is a luxury. I don't think you really know how bad it is for lots of people. A large number of Americans don't even get the choice between $20 and $200 wine.